dc.contributor.author |
Stockard, Jean |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-06-20T16:45:32Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-06-20T16:45:32Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1985 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/28419 |
|
dc.description |
This entry includes five separate PDF files: "Main article (1985 version)" 17 pages, "Main article (1986 version)" 19 pages, "Questionnaires" 321 pages, "Data and other" 95 pages, and "Codebook and frequencies" 254 pages. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
This paper examines the relative status of women school
administrators using data from a representative, national sample.
Results indicate that the administrators varied significantly on
prestige-related variables (salary, number of people supervised, and
size of district) and that it was possible to differentiate distinct
groups of women administrators using these variables. Very few (7.5%)
held high status position, while a substantial minority (32%) were in
relatively low status posts. Members of the status groups also differed
from each other on a variety of career-related, demographic, and lifestyle
related variables. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US |
en_US |
dc.subject |
prestige-related variables |
en_US |
dc.subject |
status differentiation |
en_US |
dc.subject |
social class |
en_US |
dc.title |
The Relative Status of Women Administrators: Not a Unitary Group |
en_US |
dc.type |
Other |
en_US |