Term | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Stockard, Jean | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-06-20T16:45:32Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-06-20T16:45:32Z | |
dc.date.issued | 1985 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/28419 | |
dc.description | This entry includes five separate PDF files: "Main article (1985 version)" 17 pages, "Main article (1986 version)" 19 pages, "Questionnaires" 321 pages, "Data and other" 95 pages, and "Codebook and frequencies" 254 pages. | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | This paper examines the relative status of women school administrators using data from a representative, national sample. Results indicate that the administrators varied significantly on prestige-related variables (salary, number of people supervised, and size of district) and that it was possible to differentiate distinct groups of women administrators using these variables. Very few (7.5%) held high status position, while a substantial minority (32%) were in relatively low status posts. Members of the status groups also differed from each other on a variety of career-related, demographic, and lifestyle related variables. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
dc.rights | Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US | en_US |
dc.subject | prestige-related variables | en_US |
dc.subject | status differentiation | en_US |
dc.subject | social class | en_US |
dc.title | The Relative Status of Women Administrators: Not a Unitary Group | en_US |
dc.type | Other | en_US |