dc.contributor.author |
Ansson, Richard J. Jr. |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-07-10T17:09:35Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-07-10T17:09:35Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1999 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
78 Or. L. Rev. 501 (1999) |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4435 |
|
dc.description |
50 p. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
88499 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Tribal government |
|
dc.subject |
Taxation |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 78, No. 2, p. 501-550 : State Taxation of Non-Indians Whom Do Business With Indian Tribes: Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
State Taxation of Non-Indians Whom Do Business With Indian Tribes: Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
Why Several Recent Ninth Circuit Holdings Reemphasize the Need for Indian Tribes to Enter Into Taxation Compacts With Their Respective State |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |