dc.contributor.author |
Simon, Dan |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2007-07-31T17:23:23Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2007-07-31T17:23:23Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2000 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
79 Or. L. Rev. 1033 (2000) |
en |
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/4581 |
|
dc.description |
48 p. |
en |
dc.format.extent |
123507 bytes |
|
dc.format.mimetype |
application/pdf |
|
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon School of Law |
en |
dc.subject |
Judicial reasoning |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 79, No. 4, p. 1033-1080 : On the Double-Consciousness of Judging: The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
On the Double-Consciousness of Judging: The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo |
en |
dc.title.alternative |
The Problematic Legacy of Cardozo |
en |
dc.type |
Article |
en |