dc.contributor.author |
Dominguez, David |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2010-03-16T21:49:24Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2010-03-16T21:49:24Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2009 |
|
dc.identifier.issn |
0196-2043 |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/10284 |
|
dc.description |
38 p. |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
In this Article, I offer a provocative perspective on the future of
affirmative action in higher education. Given the revolutionary
opinions of the U.S. Supreme Court in Brown v. Board of Education
and Hernandez v. Texas, and more recent Court rulings such as
Grutter v. Bollinger (Grutter), Parents Involved in Community
Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, and Meredith v. Jefferson
County Board of Education (collectively Parents Involved), I take
issue with both sides in the current debate. End or defend? Neither
side is facing reality. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en_US |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
University of Oregon Law School |
en_US |
dc.subject |
Affirmative action programs in education |
|
dc.title |
Oregon Law Review : Vol. 88 No. 1, p.157-194 : Legal Education and the Ecology of Cultural Justice: How Affirmative Action Can Become Race-Neutral by 2028 |
en_US |
dc.title.alternative |
Legal Education and the Ecology of Cultural Justice: How Affirmative Action Can Become Race-Neutral by 2028 |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |