Cause and Effect Theories of Attention: The Role of Conceptual Metaphors

Show simple item record Johnson, Mark, 1949- Fernandez-Duque, Diego, 1967- 2006-02-07T15:54:19Z 2006-02-07T15:54:19Z 2002-06
dc.identifier.citation Review of General Psychology. Vol. 6, No.2, June 2002 (139-152) en
dc.identifier.issn 1089-2680
dc.description 35 p. This is a final draft manuscript. This article may not exactly replicate the final version published in the APA/EPF journal. It is not a copy of record. The published version can be viewed at en
dc.description.abstract In everyday discourse, as well as in science, concepts of attention are defined by metaphors. In scientific theories these metaphors determine what attention is and what count as adequate explanations of the phenomena. We analyze these metaphors in the context of three types of attention theories: (1)'Cause' theories, in which attention is presumed to modulate information-processing (e .g., Attention as a Spotlight ; Attention as a Limited Resource), (2 )`effect' theories, in which attention is considered to be the by-product of information-processing (e.g., the Competition metaphor), and (3) hybrid theories that combine `cause' and `effect' aspects (e .g., Biased-Competition models). Our analysis reveals the crucial role of metaphors in cognitive psychology, neuroscience, and the efforts of scientists to find a resolution to the classic problem of `cause' versus `effect' interpretations. en
dc.format.extent 2975 bytes
dc.format.extent 17581264 bytes
dc.format.mimetype text/plain
dc.format.mimetype application/pdf
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher American Psychological Association en
dc.title Cause and Effect Theories of Attention: The Role of Conceptual Metaphors en
dc.type Article en

Files in this item

Files Size Format View
Philo_Johnson_Fernandez_Cause_OCR.pdf 16.76Mb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record