dc.contributor.author |
Lasher, Michael |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2008-11-13T23:32:54Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2008-11-13T23:32:54Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
2008-11-13T23:32:54Z |
|
dc.identifier.uri |
http://hdl.handle.net/1794/7823 |
|
dc.description |
This paper was completed as part of the final research component in the University of Oregon Applied Information Management Master's Degree Program [see htpp://aim.uoregon.edu]. |
en |
dc.description.abstract |
This study examines the most common video surveillance applications currently used by private entities in public spaces. Through literature review and content analysis (Leedy and Ormrod, 2005) the paper examines: monitoring, facial recognition, inclusion of video in larger databases, tracking, and security applications (Davis, 2005). Purported benefits of these technologies are aligned with potential privacy intrusions. A personal decision tool provides readers with a process to evaluate their own feelings about video surveillance and privacy. |
en |
dc.relation.ispartofseries |
AIM Capstone 2006;Michael Lasher |
|
dc.subject |
Security applications |
en |
dc.subject |
Privacy intrusion |
en |
dc.subject |
Applied Information Management |
en |
dc.subject |
Data |
en |
dc.subject |
Facial recognition |
en |
dc.subject |
Video surveillance |
en |
dc.subject |
AIM |
|
dc.title |
When Private Entities Use Video Surveillance in Public Space: Personal Benefits vs. Privacy Infringements |
en |
dc.type |
Other |
en |