Ranking State Fiscal Structures using Theory and Evidence

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Bania, Neil
dc.contributor.author Stone, Joe A. (Joe Allan), 1948-
dc.date.accessioned 2009-01-15T17:36:30Z
dc.date.available 2009-01-15T17:36:30Z
dc.date.issued 2007-06
dc.identifier.uri http://hdl.handle.net/1794/8306
dc.description 30 p. en
dc.description.abstract This paper offers unique rankings of the extent to which fiscal structures of U.S. states contribute to economic growth. The rankings are novel in two key respects: they are well grounded in established growth theory, in which the effect of taxes depends both on the level of taxes and on the composition of expenditures; and they are derived from actual estimates of the link between fiscal structures and economic growth. Estimates for the latter yield a growth hill, in which the incremental effect of taxes spent on productive services and infrastructure initially rises, reaches a peak, and then declines. Rankings derived from these estimates differ sharply from typical rankings based on levels of taxation alone. Two hypothetical policy experiments highlight both the growth-hill effects of tax investments in productive services and infrastructure and the short- and long-term tradeoffs in attempting to fund strong social services. en
dc.language.iso en_US en
dc.publisher University of Oregon, Dept of Economics en
dc.relation.ispartofseries University of Oregon Economics Department Working Papers;2008-6
dc.subject Tax investments en
dc.subject Fiscal structures en
dc.subject Economic growth en
dc.subject Growth theory en
dc.title Ranking State Fiscal Structures using Theory and Evidence en
dc.type Working Paper en


Files in this item

Files Size Format View
UO-2007_Bania_Fiscal.pdf 152.7Kb PDF View/Open

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record