Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorFrank, David A.
dc.date.accessioned2010-11-09T21:12:26Z
dc.date.available2010-11-09T21:12:26Z
dc.date.issued2003
dc.identifier.citationFrank, David A. "The Jewish Counter model: Talmudic Argumentation, the New Rhetoric Project, and the Classical Tradition of Rhetoric." Journal of Communication and Religion 26 (2003): 163-194.en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1794/10825
dc.description32 p.en_US
dc.description.abstractChaim Perelman and Lucie Olbrechts- Tyteca's New Rhetoric Project (NRP) helped revive the study of rhetoric in the twentieth century. Although some believe their work is largely a reiteration of Aristotle's rhetoric and that Perelman owes a significant debt to Aristotle, I present evidence in this paper that Perelman was quite critical of the Western tradition of philosophy and of Aristotle's logic and rhetoric. Perelman turned to Jewish thinking and Talmudic argumentation as a countermodel. Jewish metaphysics, ontology, epistemology, and argument are the central touchstones of the NRP.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherThe Religious Communication Associationen_US
dc.subjectTalmudic argumentationen_US
dc.subjectAristotle. Rhetoricen_US
dc.subjectRhetoricen_US
dc.subjectJudaismen_US
dc.subjectPerelman, Chaimen_US
dc.subjectOlbrechts-Tyteca, Lucie
dc.titleThe Jewish Countermodel: Talmudic Argumentation, the New Rhetoric Project, and the Classical Tradition of Rhetoricen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record