dc.contributor.author |
Johnson, Miriam M. |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Stockard, Jean |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Acker, Joan |
|
dc.contributor.author |
Naffziger, Claudeen |
|
dc.date.accessioned |
2023-04-19T20:14:58Z |
|
dc.date.available |
2023-04-19T20:14:58Z |
|
dc.date.issued |
1975-08 |
|
dc.identifier.citation |
Johnson, M. M., Stockard, J., Acker, J., & Naffziger C. (1975). Expressiveness Reevaluated. School Review, 83, 617—644. https://doi.org/10.1086/443218 |
en_US |
dc.identifier.uri |
https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/handle/1794/28201 |
|
dc.description |
28 pages |
en_US |
dc.description.abstract |
Whether one envisions a socially androgynous world as an eminent
disaster or a desirable long-term goal, it is clear that men
and women do differ and have always differed cross-culturally
and historically in their roles, attitudes, motivation, and
self-conceptions. But social scientists who try to define and
measure sex differences are beset with problems. |
en_US |
dc.language.iso |
en |
en_US |
dc.publisher |
Academic Press |
en_US |
dc.rights |
Creative Commons BY-NC-ND 4.0-US |
en_US |
dc.subject |
gender roles |
en_US |
dc.subject |
sex |
en_US |
dc.subject |
femininity |
en_US |
dc.subject |
masculinity |
en_US |
dc.title |
Expressiveness Reevaluated |
en_US |
dc.type |
Article |
en_US |