Oregon Review of International Law : Volume 13, Number 2 (2011)
Permanent URI for this collection
Browse
Recent Submissions
Now showing 1 - 8 of 8
Item Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 427-466 : Organ Transploitation: A Model Law Approach to Combat Human Trafficking and Transplant Tourism(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Ainley, RobertItem Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 395-425 : Where There Is Smoke, There Is Fire: An Argument for Employees’ Universal Right to Smoke-Free Workplaces Under International Human Rights Law(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Rosenthal, Danielle B.Item Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 355-394 : Friends, Persons, Citizens: Comparative Perspectives on Locus Standi and the Access of Private Applicants to Sub-Regional Trade Judiciaries in Africa(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Sang YK, BrianItem Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 317-354 : How Consumer Bankruptcy Reforms Can Help Save Microfinance in India(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Solan, David E.Item Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 305-315 : Observations from a TRIPS Perspective: Do We Need a Traditional Medicine Exemption for Patent Standards?(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Zhang, DongItem Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 209-262 : Intellectual Property and Innovation: A Case Study of High-Tech Industries in China(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Li, YahongItem Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 209-262 : The Middle Kingdom and the Intellectual Property World(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Yu, Peter K.This Article scrutinizes China’s participation in the international intellectual property regime and its role in both the WTO and WIPO. Part I discusses China’s engagement with international intellectual property norms before its accession to the WTO in December 2001. It points out that China is not the “norm breaker” one typically infers from its disappointing record of intellectual property protection. Instead, the country should be viewed as a “norm taker,” having accepted most of the WIPO-administered intellectual property treaties available for ratification.Item Open Access Oregon Review of International Law : Vol. 13, No. 2, p. 207-208 : Introduction to the Oregon Review of International Law’s Fifth Symposium Issue: China’s Role in Regulating the Global Information Economy(University of Oregon School of Law, 2011) Jordan, Allison